Dear Father Colletti,                                                                                                January 23, 2006

            Last evning I sat silently through that  2 1/2 hours of anguished wrangling between you and perhaps 40 of your parishioners over what the archdiocese is trying to do to us.  Now, I am following Jack Shanley's example, which I very much admire, by addressing this open letter to you, expressing to you and my fellow parishioners my view of what the archdiocese is trying to do to us, and what we must do about it.  Like you, I am very much saddened by this whole process, not the least because of the way it places you in the middle of a conflict between your arbitrary and uncommunicative superiors in the archdiocese and parishioners who love you, and I believe that you love in return.

            In short, the Archbishop's mandate that there is to be but one parish in Lexington is tantamount to closing Sacred Heart Parish.  That mandate is unjust and unwise.  We must do everything we can to persuade the Archbishop to change his mind.

            The mandate is unjust because it would confiscate parish assets to help relieve diocesan financial problems we had nothing to do with creating, but which, willy-nilly, we will have to do our share in relieving.  But to close a small number of viable and unwilling parishes, such as Sacred Heart, is to place an unjust and unfair share of the diocese's financial problem on these parishes, leaving the much larger number of untouched parishes completely or substantially free of this burden.  That is manifestly unjust.

            The Archbishop says that not only poor parishes must suffer; rather, that the suffering must be shared by the more fortunate.  I agree, but why just a few of the more fortunate?  That is unjust.  We should all share in this burden, in proportion to our capacity, through voluntary contributions.

            The Archbishop says that there are not enough priests to staff all the parishes.   As he marginalizes priests who oppose his unjust and unwise actions, that prophecy is self-fulfilling and accelerated, to say nothing of its injustice to those priests.  Clearly, in the longer term, we will have to live with fewer priests until the Church recognizes the obvious, that intelligence, holiness, and a pastoral call should be the only pre-requisites for the priesthood.  In the vast majority of dioceses in the US the shortage is being dealt with by sharing pastors among two or more parishes.  Why not Boston?  Are the priests unwilling?

            That the Archbishop's mandate is unwise is manifest in the anger and dissension that it has created at Sacred Heart and St. Brigid, the damage that it has already done to the community, the people it has driven away from the Church, and the psychological barriers it has created among those who would otherwise evangelize.  All of these emotions were on display last evening.

            It is all unjust, unwise, and unnecessary.  We must persuade the Archbishop to change his mind.

            That you are not persuaded of these points puzzles me.  You have told me that your vow of obedience is not the whole story, that you visualize an ideal of one parish in Lexington.  If that is so, and I have no reason to doubt it,  I think that your priestly vocation of accepting being moved from parish to parish from time to time may have  left you insufficiently valuing the ethos which pervades a community which has worshipped together for decades, has grown in faith together through study and mutual awareness, and striven to follow the beautides together in caring for the less fortunate, an ethos which is longed for and highly valued even by those whose life situaution precludes there sharing it for as long as a decade.  Each community has its particular ethos.  They cannot just be grafted onto one another without irreparable harm.

            The Archbishop must be persuaded to change his mind.  It pains me that the forthcoming survey, which purports to ask parishioners what their desires are for the Catholic Community in Lexington, does not ask whether they want one parish, or rather, whether they want the two existing parishes to continue, but in a relationship which would foster mutual benefit.  Inasmuch as the results of this survey will inevitably come to the attention of the Archbishop, I intend to urge all parishioners who are so inclined to write in their preference for this result.

            The Archbishop must be persuaded to change his mind.                                                

                                                                        Sincerely,

 

 

                                                                        Ted Heuchling

cc. The Master Planning Committee, c/o St. Brigid Rectory